Skip to content
    Wide-faced person perceived as powerful, but study shows it's a complex finding.

    A study found that people with wider faces are perceived as more powerful but...

    This finding means that people with wider faces are seen as more in charge and authoritative, but at the same time, less honest. It's interesting because our brains make these quick judgments based on facial shape, even though it might not reflect a person's true character.

    Last updated: Saturday 13th September 2025

    Quick Answer

    Having a wider face can make people see you as more powerful and in charge, but surprisingly, also less trustworthy. This is fascinating because it shows how our brains quickly judge others based on physical traits like face shape, often unfairly linking it to their personality or capabilities.

    In a hurry? TL;DR

    • 1Wider faces are perceived as more powerful, but simultaneously less trustworthy, due to facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR).
    • 2Higher fWHR correlates with perceived aggression and social dominance, potentially linked to higher testosterone levels during puberty.
    • 3Evolutionarily, wider faces signaled robustness and strength, influencing human subconscious social judgments.
    • 4Research shows men with higher fWHR may be more exploitative in negotiations and less cooperative financially.
    • 5Wide-faced CEOs can lead firms to better financial performance but may face suspicion from subordinates, undermining leadership cohesion.
    • 6Perceptions of untrustworthiness in wider-faced individuals often outweigh actual behavior, despite potential leadership benefits.

    Why It Matters

    It's intriguing that a wider face, which signals power, simultaneously makes people seem less trustworthy.

    Researchers have discovered that individuals with wider faces are instinctively perceived as more dominant and powerful, yet simultaneously viewed as significantly less trustworthy. This facial symmetry, known as the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), serves as a subconscious social shorthand that influences everything from boardroom promotions to courtroom verdicts.

    Key Data: The fWHR Metric

    • Primary Metric: The distance between the left and right cheekbones divided by the distance between the upper lip and the brow.
    • The Power Correlation: Higher fWHR scores correlate with perceived aggression and social dominance.
    • The Trust Deficit: A 2013 study published in Psychological Science found a direct inverse relationship between face width and perceived integrity.
    • Biological Driver: Research suggests high testosterone levels during puberty may contribute to wider bone structures.

    Why the Width Matters

    We are hardwired to scan faces for survival cues within milliseconds of meeting someone. A wide face, measured from zygomatic arch to zygomatic arch, often signals physical robustness. In evolutionary terms, this was a marker of a formidable opponent or a strong protector.

    However, the same traits that signal power often trigger a defensive response in others. We associate the physical markers of dominance with a higher likelihood of self-interest and rule-breaking. It is a psychological trade-off: we want the wide-faced individual leading the charge, but we might not want them holding our wallet.

    The Science of the Square Face

    A definitive study led by Michael Haselhuhn and Elaine Wong at the University of California, Riverside, examined how these facial proportions impact professional behavior. Their research revealed that men with higher fWHR were more likely to exploit others in negotiations and less likely to cooperate in financial games.

    The researchers didn't just look at perceptions; they looked at outcomes. They found that while wide-faced CEOs often lead firms to better financial performance in specific competitive environments, those same leaders are frequently viewed with suspicion by their subordinates. This creates a paradox where the very features that suggest leadership capability also undermine the social cohesion required to lead effectively.

    Perception vs. Reality

    It is vital to distinguish between perceived character and actual behavior. While high fWHR is linked to higher testosterone—which can drive competitive and aggressive traits—the perception of untrustworthiness often outpaces the reality.

    This suggests that wider-faced individuals may be more comfortable with risk and competition, which translates to business success, even if it alienates them socially. Unlike people with narrower, more oval faces, square-faced individuals are often saddled with a predator bias before they even speak.

    Real-World Applications

    • Corporate Leadership: Recruiters often subconsciously prefer wider-faced candidates for roles requiring "toughness," even if the role actually requires high levels of empathy and trust-building.
    • Legal Strategy: Defense attorneys have noted that clients with wider faces may face harsher perceptions from juries, necessitating more effort to establish their likeability and integrity.
    • Competitive Sports: In high-impact sports like ice hockey, studies have shown that players with wider faces often spend more time in the penalty box, yet are consistently rated as more valuable to the team's defensive power.

    Is this effect the same for men and women?

    Most studies show that the link between face width and perceived aggression is significantly stronger in men. This is largely attributed to the role of testosterone in skeletal development during male puberty, which creates more pronounced differences in fWHR between the sexes.

    Can you change how your face width is perceived?

    While you cannot change your bone structure, facial hair and eyewear can alter the perceived proportions of a face. Beards can add height to a face, potentially softening the power-trust paradox by narrowing the visual ratio.

    Does a wide face always mean someone is aggressive?

    No. Facial width is a biological marker, not a destiny. Cultural upbringing, education, and personal character have far more influence on actual behavior than the distance between cheekbones. The danger lies in the observer's bias, not the subject's personality.

    Key Takeaways

    • Faces with a high width-to-height ratio (fWHR) are viewed as more powerful and dominant.
    • These same individuals are frequently rated as less trustworthy and more likely to be deceptive.
    • The bias is rooted in evolutionary biology and the historical link between testosterone and physical resilience.
    • Wide-faced leaders often excel in competitive negotiations but struggle with perceived approachability.
    • Understanding this bias allows us to check our subconscious judgements during interviews or social introductions.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    People with wider faces, specifically a higher facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), are perceived as more powerful and dominant, but simultaneously less trustworthy.

    The facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is a metric calculated by dividing the distance between the left and right cheekbones by the distance between the upper lip and the brow.

    Wider faces are subconsciously associated with physical robustness and dominance, traits that historically signaled a strong protector or formidable opponent, likely influenced by higher testosterone levels during puberty.

    Studies suggest that companies led by men with wider faces can achieve higher profitability, possibly due to a greater comfort with risk and competition, even though these leaders may be rated as less trustworthy.

    Sources & References